microscope:sem:coating
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| microscope:sem:coating [2013/07/11 05:05] – mcmaster | microscope:sem:coating [Unknown date] (current) – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | Ways to deposit material: | ||
| - | * Physical vapor deposition (PVD) | ||
| - | * Sputtering: electric field rips ion off of sacrificial electrode (" | ||
| - | * Evaporation: | ||
| - | * Chemical vapor deposition (CVD): generally not used for SEM sample prep? | ||
| - | |||
| - | This article focuses on PVD. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ====== Sputtering ====== | ||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Sample machine spec ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | http:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | "For a typical modern magnetron sputter coater": | ||
| - | * Vacuum: 8 x l0-2 to 2 x l0-2 mbar (60 mTorr to 15 mTorr) | ||
| - | * Sputtering Voltage: 100V to 3Kv | ||
| - | * Current: 0 to 50mA | ||
| - | * Deposition: 0 to 25 nm/min | ||
| - | * Grain Size: < 5 nm | ||
| - | * Temperature Rise: < 10°C | ||
| - | |||
| - | ====== Evaporation ====== | ||
| - | |||
| - | Material is typically evaporated in either a " | ||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Boat ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | A boat is basically a strip of conductive material with an indentation in the center to hold the material to be evaporated. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Sample is typically mounted upside-down above the boat so that it deposits evenly. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Filament ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | Filaments are similar except that the material is placed inside a spiral. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ====== Coating material ====== | ||
| - | |||
| - | Factors in choosing a coating material: | ||
| - | * Do you have equipment to sufficiently heat it? | ||
| - | * Do you have equipment to achieve the necessary vacuum? | ||
| - | * Does it need to be removed? | ||
| - | * Will depositing it alter the sample? | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Platinum ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | Good coating material but difficult to remove. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Carbon ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | Reasonable coating material that is easy to remove. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Titanium ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Copper ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | Could possibly work? People sputter Cu without too much trouble in medium vacuum (10E-6 torr) | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Tungsten ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | Might work but generally not used because its difficult to find something to evaporate it from | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Aluminum ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | Probably not usable due to rapid surface oxidation | ||
microscope/sem/coating.1373519136.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/10/20 14:59 (external edit)
