decap:metal
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| decap:metal [2012/07/21 22:59] – mcmaster | decap:metal [2025/08/04 21:23] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | See also: [[decap: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| ====== Lid ====== | ====== Lid ====== | ||
| - | Professional labs use miniature can openers to avoid getting any fragments into the package since failure analysis may want to see if the device failed from particulates. | + | ===== Can opener ===== |
| + | |||
| + | Professional labs use miniature can openers to avoid getting any fragments into the package since failure analysis may want to see if the device failed from particulates. | ||
| - | http:// | + | ===== Cutting ===== |
| - | ====== Die ====== | + | While can openers are good for failure analysis, for RE purposes a Dremel can suffice followed by a good clean. |
| - | Sometimes dies are soldered to a substrate (eg: silver heatsink / carrier). | ||
| - | {{: | + | ===== Thermal ===== |
| - | Note the raised corners. | + | Ceramic-metal lids can also be removed with a torch. |
| - | {{: | ||
| - | Of course, it might take a while to get under the entire die. Heating without will help to get it off but I have found that it can take a lot of force to move even with solder melted and so its best to chemically remove as much silver as possible first. | + | ====== References ====== |
| + | * TO-3 Dremel: http:// | ||
decap/metal.1342911566.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/10/20 14:59 (external edit)
