cleaning
                Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| cleaning [2012/02/20 08:41] – [Pressurized solvent] mcmaster | cleaning [2025/08/04 21:23] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Optics cleaning gives a lot of general guidelines on cleaning, consider consulting a textbook for more detail. | Optics cleaning gives a lot of general guidelines on cleaning, consider consulting a textbook for more detail. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| ====== Choice of solvent ====== | ====== Choice of solvent ====== | ||
| Line 9: | Line 6: | ||
| * Alcohols, especially isopropanol (isopropyl alcohol) and ethanol | * Alcohols, especially isopropanol (isopropyl alcohol) and ethanol | ||
| * Acetone | * Acetone | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== JM chip cleaning procedure as of 03/09/2013 ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Fill 10 mL glass vial w/ polyprolyene cap about 2/3 full with acetone | ||
| + | * Glass has better acoustic coupling than plastic and removes a lot more | ||
| + | * Place chip in above vial and sonicate for 1 minute | ||
| + | * Empty acetone out into second identical vial, leaving the chip behind | ||
| + | * Fill 50 mL polypropylene (PP) vial with 30 mL water + detergent | ||
| + | * glass vial would probably work just as well if not better | ||
| + | * Shake chip from glass vial into PP vial | ||
| + | * Sonicate for 1 minute | ||
| + | * Pour solution from 50 mL PP into second identical PP, leaving chip behind | ||
| + | * Flood chip with water in vial, letting it fill past the top and refilling a few times until all suds are removed | ||
| + | * Fill another 50 mL PP with 30 mL acetone | ||
| + | * Shake chip from empty suds vial into final wash acetone vial | ||
| + | * Sonicate for one minute | ||
| + | * Pour most of acetone, leaving a few drops, into yet another 50 mL bottle | ||
| + | * With lid closed, shake chip so that its near mouth of vial with die facing up | ||
| + | * Alternatively carefully slosh it up there before pouring | ||
| + | * Use carbon fiber tweezers to grab die and place face up in PP sealable petri dish | ||
| + | * Seal petri dish | ||
| + | |||
| + | Other notes: | ||
| + | * All vials are labeled to easily tell apart solutions | ||
| + | * The final acetone vial should have a flat surface near the lid to make it easy to grab | ||
| + | * Don't use the same acetone solution or vial for the initial and final wash | ||
| + | |||
| ====== Ultrasound ====== | ====== Ultrasound ====== | ||
| - | Acetone bath + ultrasonic cleaning (ultrasound) are effective to remove latent debris and generally is the preferred workhouse method in a professional setup. If ultrasound is not available, first try pressurized solvent from a squirt bottle or pipette. | + | Acetone bath + ultrasonic cleaning (ultrasound) are effective to remove latent debris and generally is the preferred workhouse method in a professional setup. If ultrasound is not available, first try pressurized solvent from a squirt bottle or pipette. | 
| Procedure | Procedure | ||
| - Literature [1] indicates a minute in ultrasound should be sufficient to clean the die | - Literature [1] indicates a minute in ultrasound should be sufficient to clean the die | ||
| + | - 1 minute in acetone (remove bulk debris) | ||
| + | - 1 minute in suds (remove polarized debris) | ||
| + | - 1 minute in acetone (high purity " | ||
| + | |||
| + | I use a setup like this to keep which vial holds which sample straight: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Each type of clean has two bottles, one active with chip and solvent and one empty. | ||
| Notes | Notes | ||
| Line 30: | Line 63: | ||
| * Higher initial cost than other techniques presented here | * Higher initial cost than other techniques presented here | ||
| * Takes a few minutes (but hopefully you aren't THAT impatient) | * Takes a few minutes (but hopefully you aren't THAT impatient) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Choice of container ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:: | ||
| + | {{:: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Using a glass container with strong ultrasound cleans the chip well, but may be stronger than needed. | ||
| + | |||
| ===== Case study ===== | ===== Case study ===== | ||
| Line 72: | Line 114: | ||
| Uses techniques similar to those for cleaning optics. | Uses techniques similar to those for cleaning optics. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Lens tissue is preferred since its lint free and known to resist solvents like acetone without leaving residue. | ||
| + | {{gallery>: | ||
| Procedure | Procedure | ||
| Line 80: | Line 125: | ||
| Notes | Notes | ||
| - | * Careful to not confuse undissolved epoxy for | + | * Careful to not confuse undissolved epoxy for contamination. | 
| + | * Do not tear lens tissue. | ||
| Advantages | Advantages | ||
| Line 121: | Line 167: | ||
| + | ===== Polyimide passivation ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | General reccomendations: | ||
| + | * Oxygen plasma is probably best if you have access to it | ||
| + | * If you can deal with safety issues, ethylendiamine may be next best | ||
| + | * Fuming nitric aicd works but takes a while. | ||
| + | * Piranha eats it quickly but it eats other metals nearly as quickly so its probably best avoided | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Ethylendiamine ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | "find a polyimide layer that was not entirely removed by HNO3 but which can be dissolved with ethylendiamine" | ||
| + | |||
| + | Rest from [Beck 23] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | * Use straight (how much?) | ||
| + | * 100° C for 15-60 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Ethylendiamine + hydrazine monohydrate ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | " | ||
| + | |||
| + | From [Beck 23]. Use this if plain ethylendiamine does not work. Unclear if it has a higher corrosion potential, but heed the safety warning | ||
| + | |||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | * Mix (how much?) | ||
| + | * 7 mL 80% hydrazine monohydrate | ||
| + | * 1 mL ethylendiamine | ||
| + | * 100° C for 15-60? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Notes: | ||
| + | * WARNING: spontaneous combustion can occur over 120° C | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Ethylendiamine + hydrazine monohydrate ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Beck 23] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | * Mix | ||
| + | * 3 mL ethylendiamine | ||
| + | * 1 mL 98% acetic acid | ||
| + | * Cook 120-130° C for 10-30 minutes | ||
| + | |||
| + | Notes: | ||
| + | * Mix slowly (or what?) | ||
| + | * Stir vigorously | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Caro's acid ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Beck 23] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | * Mix | ||
| + | * 7 mL (98%?) H2SO4 | ||
| + | * 1 mL 30% H2O2 | ||
| + | * Cook at 80° C | ||
| + | |||
| + | Notes: | ||
| + | * Seems like this is same thing as [[Piranha solution]]? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Fuming nitric acid (FNA) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | When decapping part with WFNA/RFNA the amide layer will usually be simply dissolved [Beck 23, personal experience] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Beck mentions " | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Oxygen plasma ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | " | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Dimethyl sulphoxide + ethanolamine ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Beck 23] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | * Mix | ||
| + | * 3 mL dimethyl sulphoxide | ||
| + | * 1 mL part ethanolamine | ||
| + | * Cook at 110° C | ||
| + | |||
| + | WARNING: | ||
| + | * Spontaneous combustion above 120° C | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Gel passivation ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Chip with some damaged gel: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Some chips have what I believe to be silica gel passivation. | ||
| ====== See also ====== | ====== See also ====== | ||
cleaning.1329727266.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/10/20 14:59 (external edit)
                
                