User Tools

Site Tools


mcmaster:atmel:at89c52

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
mcmaster:atmel:at89c52 [2016/11/06 00:19] mcmastermcmaster:atmel:at89c52 [2025/05/18 00:26] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 13: Line 13:
 {{:mcmaster:atmel:at89c52:die.jpg?300|}} {{:mcmaster:atmel:at89c52:die.jpg?300|}}
  
-[[https://siliconpr0n.org/map/atmel/at89c52/mz_mit20x/|MZ @ mit20x]] +[[https://siliconpr0n.org/map/atmel/at89c52/mcmaster_mz_mit20x/|MZ @ mit20x]] 
-  * [[https://siliconpr0n.org/map/atmel/at89c52/single/atmel_at89c52_mz_mit20x.jpg|Single]] (33 MB, 12803x7849)+  * [[https://siliconpr0n.org/map/atmel/at89c52/single/atmel_at89c52_mcmaster_mz_mit20x.jpg|Single]] (33 MB, 12803x7849)
  
 I went to ultrasound it to try to clean it up and it tore up the pads.  I used 9 WFNA : 1 H2SO4 for decap.  Straight WFNA may have been less gentle on the package but more gentle on the pads.  Maybe only use 91 if the leadframe gets exposed or copper wires (which should be fine if WFNA remains concentrated anyway). I went to ultrasound it to try to clean it up and it tore up the pads.  I used 9 WFNA : 1 H2SO4 for decap.  Straight WFNA may have been less gentle on the package but more gentle on the pads.  Maybe only use 91 if the leadframe gets exposed or copper wires (which should be fine if WFNA remains concentrated anyway).
  
mcmaster/atmel/at89c52.1478391555.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/11/06 00:19 by mcmaster