Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
mcmaster [2016/10/07 05:16]
mcmaster
mcmaster [2017/11/28 19:24]
mcmaster removed
Line 33: Line 33:
  
 I got a lot of requests to image stuff, so here's my official policy. I got a lot of requests to image stuff, so here's my official policy.
 +
 +In short, I focus on chips that are of interest to me.  I do lots of chips for others, but I give priority to people that are able to provide funds.
  
 In terms of consumables, equipment wear etc, each simple chip costs me about $20 to decap/image (not counting huge equipment NRE).  As of 2014, a professional shop charges around $100 for a simple, low resolution top metal dceap/image.  People give me upwards of $150 per simple chip if they are feeling generous and want to support other projects.  Simple => not implant ROM and preferably does not require delayering.  Not sure what a shop would charge for delayering, but lets say upwards of $100 donation for delayering.  Chips from the 80's should be simple. In terms of consumables, equipment wear etc, each simple chip costs me about $20 to decap/image (not counting huge equipment NRE).  As of 2014, a professional shop charges around $100 for a simple, low resolution top metal dceap/image.  People give me upwards of $150 per simple chip if they are feeling generous and want to support other projects.  Simple => not implant ROM and preferably does not require delayering.  Not sure what a shop would charge for delayering, but lets say upwards of $100 donation for delayering.  Chips from the 80's should be simple.
Line 43: Line 45:
  
 Most of this is targeted towards small chips up to the mid 90's.  If the die is obnoxiously large (ex: 486 CPU) it will be difficult for me to photograph and stitch the entire thing.  Similarly I unfortunately do not have EM capabilities to image fine processes.  180 nm is doable on my equipment but really pushing it (ex: XC2C32A). Most of this is targeted towards small chips up to the mid 90's.  If the die is obnoxiously large (ex: 486 CPU) it will be difficult for me to photograph and stitch the entire thing.  Similarly I unfortunately do not have EM capabilities to image fine processes.  180 nm is doable on my equipment but really pushing it (ex: XC2C32A).
 +
 +Other: most of the work is in decapping, not actual imaging. If you happen to already have a bare die and would be satisfied with a quick / lower quality scan, feel free to send me a few dies. This may actually work out well for you since most of the money is in the microscope, not the decapping supplies.
  
 Please provide the following information for each chip: Please provide the following information for each chip:
 
 
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution 4.0 International
Recent changes RSS feed Donate Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki