Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
mcmaster [2016/11/21 10:44]
mcmaster
mcmaster [2017/11/28 19:24]
mcmaster removed
Line 45: Line 45:
  
 Most of this is targeted towards small chips up to the mid 90's.  If the die is obnoxiously large (ex: 486 CPU) it will be difficult for me to photograph and stitch the entire thing.  Similarly I unfortunately do not have EM capabilities to image fine processes.  180 nm is doable on my equipment but really pushing it (ex: XC2C32A). Most of this is targeted towards small chips up to the mid 90's.  If the die is obnoxiously large (ex: 486 CPU) it will be difficult for me to photograph and stitch the entire thing.  Similarly I unfortunately do not have EM capabilities to image fine processes.  180 nm is doable on my equipment but really pushing it (ex: XC2C32A).
 +
 +Other: most of the work is in decapping, not actual imaging. If you happen to already have a bare die and would be satisfied with a quick / lower quality scan, feel free to send me a few dies. This may actually work out well for you since most of the money is in the microscope, not the decapping supplies.
  
 Please provide the following information for each chip: Please provide the following information for each chip:
 
 
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution 4.0 International
Recent changes RSS feed Donate Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki